VerifyAI vs FocalX
Comparing on-device photo verification against FocalX's cloud-based vehicle inspection platform for fleet, rental, and insurance use cases.
Try VerifyAIChoosing Between VerifyAI and FocalX
FocalX is a Copenhagen-based AI vehicle inspection company founded in 2021 by Isabella Agdestein (CEO), Pritam Bolenwar, Nishchith Uchil, and Carlos Pasquali. With approximately 40 employees, they raised €1.8M in a seed round led by byFounders in February 2025 (~$2.08M total across 4 rounds). They serve major car rental brands including Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Europcar, and Sixt across eight markets in Europe, the UK, and Latin America.
VerifyAI offers on-device photo verification with transparent per-verification pricing, no annual contracts, and a self-service SDK that integrates in hours. While FocalX focuses on comprehensive vehicle inspections with cloud processing, VerifyAI delivers real-time on-device damage detection, parking verification, and proof of delivery.
In this comparison, we examine both platforms across pricing, technology architecture, integration experience, use case coverage, and company track record to help you choose the right solution.
Quick Verdict
VerifyAI is significantly cheaper with transparent pricing, on-device processing, and self-service access. FocalX has a stronger presence in the European car rental market with Enterprise, Europcar, and Sixt as customers and offers a more comprehensive vehicle inspection workflow.
Choose VerifyAI for cost-effective, real-time on-device verification with no sales process. Choose FocalX if you need a full vehicle inspection platform with 360-degree guided scans and already operate in the European car rental market.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Switch Labs | FocalX |
|---|---|---|
| Per-Verification Cost We Win | $0.008 | Not public (custom enterprise) |
| Annual Platform Fee We Win | $0 | Not public |
| Monthly Minimum We Win | None | Custom contracts |
| Annual Commitment We Win | None | Enterprise contracts required |
| Self-Service Signup We Win | ||
| On-Device Processing We Win | ||
| Damage Detection | ||
| 360° Guided Vehicle Scan They Win | ||
| Parking Verification We Win | ||
| Proof of Delivery We Win | ||
| Offline Support We Win | ||
| iOS & Android SDK | ||
| White-Label App They Win | ||
| Web Inspection Portal They Win | ||
| Integration Time We Win | Hours | Weeks (requires demo + setup) |
| Fraud Detection We Win | ||
| Enterprise Rental Customers They Win | Limited | Enterprise, Europcar, Sixt |
Detailed Comparison
Pricing
FocalX does not publish pricing. All contracts are custom enterprise agreements that require booking a demo and going through a sales process. Based on their enterprise-focused go-to-market serving Fortune 500 car rental companies, pricing likely involves annual commitments and volume-based contracts.
VerifyAI charges a flat $0.008 per verification with no platform fees, no monthly minimums, and no annual commitment. Volume pricing drops to $0.005 at 100K/month and $0.003 at 1M+/month. You can sign up and start integrating immediately without talking to sales.
Without public pricing from FocalX, exact cost comparisons are difficult. However, VerifyAI's transparent model lets you calculate costs upfront, while FocalX requires a sales conversation before you can even estimate your spend.
Technology & Processing Architecture
FocalX uses cloud-based processing built on AWS where multiple ML models process each image simultaneously. Their 360-degree guided scan app walks users through capturing the full vehicle exterior and interior, providing real-time visual AI feedback during the scan. Results are generated in seconds after upload. They also offer AI-powered inspection tunnels for high-volume operations, which they claim reduce inspection costs by 70%.
VerifyAI processes images on-device using edge AI, meaning inference runs locally on the user's phone. This enables sub-second verification, full offline support, and better data privacy since images don't need to leave the device. VerifyAI achieves 99.2% accuracy across all verification types.
FocalX claims 40% improvement over traditional inspection methods and 6x more damage detection than manual inspections, with millimeter-precision for scratches, dents, and scuffs. However, they don't publish specific accuracy percentages. Their cloud-based approach enables richer multi-model analysis but introduces connectivity dependency that VerifyAI avoids.
Integration & Developer Experience
FocalX offers an SDK for iOS, Android, and web, plus an API for customers with existing image capture systems. They also provide a white-label standalone app and a web-based inspection portal with customizable workflows, user roles, and report templates. However, getting started requires booking a demo and going through their sales and onboarding process.
VerifyAI's SDK is designed for 3-line initialization with drop-in components for iOS, Android, React Native, and Flutter. Most teams are live within a day. Full documentation is publicly available without requiring a sales conversation.
FocalX's inspection portal and white-label app add value for organizations that want a turnkey solution without building their own UI. VerifyAI is better suited for teams that want to embed verification into their existing app with minimal friction.
Use Case Coverage
FocalX covers a broad range of automotive inspection use cases: car rental check-in/check-out, fleet condition monitoring, finished vehicle logistics, insurance claims, automotive marketplaces, gate operations, and yard operations. Their 360-degree guided scan and detailed condition reports are designed for comprehensive vehicle inspections.
VerifyAI focuses on real-time photo verification: parking compliance, damage detection, and proof of delivery. These are optimized for speed and simplicity in operational workflows where quick verification matters more than a full vehicle condition report.
FocalX has broader vehicle inspection use cases, particularly for car rental and logistics workflows that require detailed condition documentation. VerifyAI covers use cases FocalX doesn't address, including parking verification and proof of delivery, making them complementary rather than purely competitive.
Company & Track Record
FocalX was founded in 2021 in Copenhagen by Isabella Agdestein (CEO), Pritam Bolenwar, Nishchith Uchil, and Carlos Pasquali. The team has grown to approximately 40 employees. They raised €1.8M in seed funding in February 2025 led by byFounders, with $2.08M total across four rounds from investors including Lottrup & Co and NAVA (Nordic Asian Ventures). They serve Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Europcar, and Sixt across eight markets in Europe, the UK, and Latin America.
FocalX reports that clients see ROI within 3-6 months. Enterprise Norway cited ROI in the first month, and Sixt Denmark reported clear financial benefits from cut costs and improved efficiency. The company doubled revenue in their most recent quarter, signaling strong traction in the car rental vertical. Their pre-trained models use anonymized and synthetic data to detect scratches, dents, scuffs, tire wear, and undercarriage damage.
VerifyAI is newer to market with a focus on transparent pricing, self-service access, and cost efficiency. If proven enterprise car rental deployments and European market presence are your top priorities, FocalX has the edge. If cost, speed to integrate, and contract flexibility matter more, VerifyAI is the stronger choice.
Pros & Cons
Switch Labs
Pros
- Transparent per-verification pricing ($0.008, no hidden fees)
- No annual contracts, monthly minimums, or platform fees
- On-device processing for real-time results and offline support
- Self-service signup without a sales process
- Faster integration (hours vs weeks)
- Published accuracy metrics (99.2%)
- Broader verification types (parking, damage, POD, fraud detection)
Cons
- No 360-degree guided vehicle scan workflow
- No white-label standalone app or web inspection portal
- Fewer published enterprise car rental customer references
- No dedicated vehicle logistics or insurance claims features
FocalX
Pros
- Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Europcar, and Sixt as customers
- 360-degree guided scan with detailed condition reports
- White-label app and customizable web inspection portal
- Detects 6x more damages than manual inspections
- Broad automotive use cases (rental, logistics, insurance, marketplaces)
- Deployed across eight markets in Europe, UK, and Latin America
Cons
- No public pricing (requires sales conversation)
- Cloud-based processing requires internet connectivity
- No self-service signup or public documentation
- No parking verification or proof of delivery features
- No offline support for damage detection
- Integration requires demo booking and onboarding process
- No published accuracy percentages
Which Should You Choose?
Choose VerifyAI If You...
- Need transparent, pay-per-use pricing without enterprise contracts
- Want to integrate and go live in hours, not weeks
- Need on-device processing for offline support and real-time results
- Require parking verification or proof of delivery alongside damage detection
- Prefer self-service signup without a sales process
- Want published accuracy guarantees (99.2%)
Choose FocalX If You...
- Operate a car rental fleet and need comprehensive vehicle condition reports
- Want a 360-degree guided scan with detailed inspection documentation
- Need a white-label app or turnkey inspection portal
- Require vehicle logistics or insurance claims inspection workflows
- Value proven deployments with Enterprise, Europcar, and Sixt
- Operate primarily in European or Latin American markets
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready for Simpler, Cheaper Damage Detection?
On-device processing, transparent pricing, no sales calls required. Start verifying in minutes.
Get Started with VerifyAI